Sealed
So much of staying in relationship is keeping our word to others. On this Mother’s Day, we consider those nurturing relationships in our lives and how living up to our word can help to heal, and help to seal, our most important relationship.
So much of staying in relationship is keeping our word to others. On this Mother’s Day, we consider those nurturing relationships in our lives and how living up to our word can help to heal, and help to seal, our most important relationship.
It is an honor to offer others our care, our service, and our friendship. As we look together at the theme of covenant, we will explore an essential element of a covenant, an offer, and what it means to a community like our own.
“To be a consciousness or rather to be an experience is to hold inner communication with the world, the body and other people, to be with them instead of being beside them.” – Maurice Merleau Ponty. What, exactly is a body? Who or what is that “I”? If I have a body why am I so often held hostage by it? We can’t talk about the body without talking about consciousness. The problem here is that no one knows just what we are talking about then.
One of my favorite books is one of those collections of essays by David Sedaris. I know, I know, so original Rev. T. J.—you and the rest of the world. But the collection I like the best is the one called Me Talk Pretty One Day. A good portion of this book is devoted to David Sedaris’s time in France with his husband Hugh, a native French speaker. And part of David’s time in France is spent getting better at speaking French. And the result is pretty hilarious.
One essay is a discourse on the gender of inanimate objects in the French language. But a lot of the action takes place when David enrolls in an emersion French class. And one day in class a student from Morocco chimes in to ask the class made up of some Polish folks, an Italian nanny, David, a mean-spirited teacher and a few more, what Easter was all about.
The exchange begins with the Moroccan student’s question.
“Excuse me, but what’s an Easter?”[1]
It would seem that despite having grown up in a Muslim country, she would have heard it mentioned once or twice, but no. “I mean it,” she said. “I have no idea what you people are talking about.” The teacher called on the rest of us to explain. The Poles led the charge to the best of their ability. “It is,” said one, “a party for the little boy of God who call his self Jesus…”. She faltered and her fellow country-man came to her aid.
“He call his self Jesus and then he be die one day on two…morsels of…lumber.” The rest of the class jumped in, offering bits of information that would have given the pope an aneurysm.
“He die one day and then he go above of my head to live with your father.”
“He weared of himself the long hair and after he die, the first day he come back here for to say hello to the peoples.”
“He nice, the Jesus.”
“He make the good things, and on the Easter we be sad because somebody makes him dead today.”
Part of the problem had to do with vocabulary. Simple nouns such as cross and resurrection were beyond our grasp, let alone such complicated reflexive phrases as “to give of yourself your only begotten son.” Faced with the challenge of explaining the cornerstone of Christianity, we did what any self-respecting group of people might do. We talked about food instead.
“Easter is a party for to eat of the lamb,” the Italian nanny explained. “One too may eat of the chocolate.”
“And who brings the chocolate?” the teacher asked. I knew the word, so I raised my hand, saying, “The rabbit of Easter. He bring of the chocolate.”
“A rabbit?” The teacher, assuming I’d used the wrong word, positioned her index fingers on top of her head, wriggling them as though they were ears. “You mean one of these? A rabbit rabbit?”
“Well, sure,” I said. “He come in the night when one sleep on bed. Which a hand he have a basket and foods.” The teacher sighed and shook her head. As far as she was concerned, I had just explained everything wrong with my country.
“No, no,” she said. “Here in France the chocolate is brought by a big bell that flies in from Rome.”
I called for a time-out. “But how do the bell know where you live?”
“Well,” she said, “how does a rabbit?”
Not too surprisingly, the Moroccan student gave up trying to understand Easter. It was going to be impossible in a class equipped with limited vocabulary and minimal cultural sharing. It wasn’t worth the effort. And you can hardly blame her. This time of year, amid the many ways we celebrate new birth and renewal we find so many different ways of celebrating, of remembering. Just last week we filled this space with tables to honor the freedom from bondage of our Jewish forebears. And last night tables were set across the globe to celebrate the freedom of faith so many enjoy today in seders for Passover. This week, we also hear the story of Ostara. Many who recognize and celebrate this Earth’s pagan traditions enjoy this as one of the four central celebrations of the year, complete with colored eggs and rabbits. All over the earth today, our Christian siblings again renew a faith that celebrates what one among us did for love. And tomorrow we hope more and more people will join in celebrating again the very Earth we call home on Earth Day. Yes, there is so much going on this time of year, every year, it’s almost impossible to try to touch on them all…but we’re still gonna try.
See in our own community, in many Unitarian Universalist communities, how we gather here to seek the truth underlying a range of religious expressions is one answer to what might seem impossible: the celebration and recognition of many expressions all at once. One way of doing this is to try to develop a common language to talk about these faiths, and in this way we might learn to go deeper and understand fully, the messages ringing out, like a bell flown in from Rome, from the stories of the yearnings in the world’s religious heart.
And for others, we might sit back, look at a world of supernatural stories, and wonder whether it’s really all worth much at all. It would be better to stick to science or psychology or the human needs that gave rise to faith in the first place.
Both of these approaches, and others, are fine. And both of these approaches have a name. It’s a clinical term that comes to us from the annals of psychology and the prescribed treatment of some important psychological afflictions. You might want to write it down. The term is: giving up.
See, giving up is a solution suggested by clinicians to two separate afflictions of the mind. The first affliction is referred to as ego depletion, or more commonly as willpower fatigue.[2] The theory is that if a person focuses mightily, powerfully, obsessively on one, and only one primary goal, then other areas of life slip by untended in ways that overwhelm or overpower the person. The psychologist Raj Raghunathan explains that if a person is using a ton of willpower to study for a test, research shows that the studier becomes susceptible to falling short of other goals that require willpower, goals the studier normally can meet from the store of willpower they have.
After that long session of studying, the cleanliness of their home goes a little. They skip their regular jog. They indulge in sweets, like chocolate rabbits. All things they might not do otherwise. And one remedy for overdoing it with this kind of single-minded achievement seeking, is to learn when to give up. The real problem doesn’t come from studying for tests or training for a physical feat—things that are temporary. This remedy is best employed when the objective is objectively impossible. It is in those situations where psychologists have to tell their patients to consider giving up, or risk being overcome by what goes untended.
But this important spiritual principle is the cure for something else—something familiar to some of us here. Giving up is sometimes the only way out of what is called hyperopia.[3] And for those eye doctors among us, I don’t mean the physical condition more commonly referred to as farsightedness. Rather this psychological condition shares a root with its twin, myopia. Myopia describes someone who acts in a way that is shortsighted or impulsive. And conversely, a person with hyperopia, tries to take so many factors into balance, to think so long-term, that it’s impossible to enjoy anything at all in the present moment. Taken to extremes, hyperopia leaves people unsatisfied with their present life, hoping, hoping, hoping that the sacrifices they make today will pay off way in the future. And the cure for hyperopia, the route to some happiness in the present moment: giving up.
And don’t we know, we are absolutely beset, with all of the many, many, ways we are supposed to achieve, to overcome, to strive, to succeed, whether focused wildly on one goal, or widely on many, like fables woven as badges of honor, we try to live up to examples set by whom? Forbears, founding mothers and fathers, progenitors, ancestors, saviors, Goddesses, birds, and bunnies. It’s impossible to name them all, let alone live up to them.
You pick a name of someone we’re supposed to live up to, and I’ll show you someone who had to give up, too. Because it’s not possible.
There are only so many pinnacles to scale, so many pedestals to clamber upon. Guess what, we didn’t all get there, And guess what, we’re all right here, together.
Friends, this time of year is holy for many. And it holds some of the greatest accomplishments recorded in some of the faiths of our world, including faiths that gave rise to our own faith community here. I get that. But look at what else happened.
Ostara’s bird friend wasn’t getting better, wasn’t fulfilling what a bird was meant to do, so she gave up and changed him into something that could. The Christian scriptures detail the many ways that Jesus gave up his freedom, his power, his dignity in service to those he loved most in the world. And in the end he turned his head heavenward to give up his very life. The Pharaoh gave up on trying to keep the earliest Jewish community captive any longer, clearly outmatched by a God beyond his understanding or power. And tomorrow, so much of any progress we can make to heal our hurting world, means giving up…and not just our orders of service. Much of the world’s science suggests vastly more must be given up by humans even to begin to heal this world. All that we look toward today remembers or envisions a way that someone must give up. And even some psychologists are giving up…on giving up.
Over the past year or two, one of the ailments giving up is supposed to heal, ego depletion, has been called into question in psychological circles after nearly two decades of widespread acceptance.[4] But, if we focus too much on what giving up means, if we myopically train our sight on this one idea, we lose sight of the most important part of the phrase: giving.
Many, many, many of us in Unitarian Universalist communities, even before they had that name, knew well what it could mean to be in a place, to be with a people, to be so surrounded by a push to a single end, that those places, those people could not see the failings of their faiths and institutions all around them, failings so corroding and pernicious, that they threaten to swallow faiths whole.
And many of us knew well the teachings of faiths that promise salvation someday, for going, doing, being without so much, for so long, for so many today.
Whether by depletion today or by fixation on tomorrow, by keeping one thing in mind, or so much in sight, there is only one answer to seeking supernatural perfection in a natural world. And it’s a blessing so many of us have found it here.
For many of us, we did what we had to do. Giving up a quest for perfection isn’t always a virtue or a remedy. Sometimes it’s what we have to do to survive, to get through. Sometimes it’s what we get to do.
I was living in New York City and the call came in. A few days earlier, one of the people I loved most in the world died suddenly. She was in her first year of college. She was one of the most gifted actors I had the good luck to know: wise beyond her years, a voice from heaven, professionalism I’ve rarely seen since, and a sharper wit than anyone should have the right to claim.
There was going to be a memorial that weekend, so two of my best friends from high school who’d known her better than I did packed into a car, and we drove up to Rochester, New York where the memorial was going to be held. Our choir teacher arranged a vocal rehearsal for the songs we’d sing in the memorial, and we were racing across the state to get there. But to pass the time, my friends and I took turns during the ride reading aloud from a book I’d just bought, Me Talk Pretty One Day.
And the peels of our laughter mingled with the tears that streamed down our faces as we read. My belly hurt. My ribs hurt. My heart hurt.
I’m sure the pain we felt at losing our friend was part of why our bodies were giving up so much of the laughter all that afternoon.
I’m sure that walking into the choir room where we’d all given up years of our lives together was part of why I felt so comfortable taking my place among women and men I could swear were only children a short time ago.
And I’m sure that any one of us would have given up anything we could to have our friend back with us again.
But giving up isn’t always an option that works. It can be a lot of things: a remedy, a spiritual practice, a way to start a religion, a way to save the world. But it’s something else, too: it’s a gift, literally. Some people think that a faith that tries to find a language to talk about a single truth at the root of all knowing is giving up. And I say: Yeah, you bet it is.
Because as much as some of us are here because we think we are right, I swear to you that a gift of our faith is giving up the need to be right. Because as much as some of us are here because we think this is a better way, I swear to you that a gift of our faith is giving up the need to be better than anybody else. Because we give up those lessons of dominance over others taught too well by faiths of the ages, we give up hyper-fixation on what’s to come at the expense of what we hold dear, we give up proving or disproving the impossible. And that is what I call a new life.
Hatching out with vibrant colors into a new Eden of our own making, streaming out like laughter peeling from a bell clanging in our all-too-human heart, giving, giving, giving of ourselves to our siblings on this earth, siblings bound in captivity, aching for renewal, and searching for a place to call home.
So some do say dayenu, it would have been enough.
Some do turn to the four directions and call forth springtime under a moon made full, loping like a great rabbit across the sky.
Some do cry out “He is Risen Indeed” and shout “Hallelujah” ‘cross the mountains made low and valleys raised high.
And some do say we may love our Earth a little more tomorrow.
We sit in a room, students hoping to understand how we can talk to one another better, giving up what we think we know.
Children hoping to learn, how we can sing again without who we were forced to gave up.
Siblings hoping to share, what we did for the love we want to show one another and how we can hold all of this on our journey, packed together as we are on the road, holding sacred what others gave up so that we can be here together today, and knowing fully what we must give in return…and laughing, laughing, laughing on the way.
And may it ever be so.
[1] David Sedaris, Me Talk Pretty One Day (New York: Little, Brown & Co. 2000).
[2] Raj Raghunathan, “The Art of Giving Up: The importance from disengaging from goals,” Psychology Today, April 19, 2011.
[3] Raghunathan.
[4] Christian Jarrett, “’Strongest evidence yet’ for ego depletion—the idea that self control is a limited resource,” Research Digest: The British Psychological Society, December 14, 2017 (available at https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/12/14/strongest-evidence-yet-for-ego-depletion-the-idea-that-self-control-is-a-limited-resource/). The blog entry explains the current state of many studies in the field.
Join First Unitarian for our second annual intergenerational UU Seder. The Seder is followed by a pot luck lunch. Join in the fellowship of eating and drinking and the celebration of freedom.
When the earth was still flat
And clouds made of fire
And mountains stretched up to the sky, sometimes higher,
Folks roamed the earth
Like big rolling kegs.
They had two sets of arms,
They had two sets of legs,
They had two faces peering,
Out of one giant head,
So they could watch all around them, while they talked while they read.[1]
This comes from a song featured in the musical Hedwig and the Angry Inch. Some might say about this musical, “Well, it’s not for everybody.” It involves escapes from communist Germany, gender confirmation processes, broken hearts, justice for sex workers, and a lot of rock and roll. Yes, it’s not for everybody. But as you heard in the song, it is about everybody. The part of the song I recited was inspired by Plato’s Symposium, where Aristophanes tells the story that all humans were once joined as great spherical beings but they rebelled against the gods and so were separated, torn in half as punishment.[2] In the musical, though, the main character tells the story using Norse gods, Egyptian gods, and a wide range of other deities. It’s sort of a lesson in inter-religious dialogue…it just happens to be a dialogue about punishing humans for getting ahead of themselves. But in truth I tell you, Plato’s story is just one voice in a chorus of stories about the shared ancestry of humankind.
In the Kumulipo, the creation chant of these islands and one of the most sacred texts in the Hawaiian religion, some of the chant is concerned with creation by explaining the work of deities. But does anyone know what the Kumulipo is mostly filled with? Genealogies.
The genealogies of the great chiefs are told as issuing forth from the stars in the sky.[3] And the genealogies of those people governed by deities and chiefs, you know, people like us, come in a few different ways, but all humans share a common ancestor in the Kumulipo: Haloa, who became the kalo plant and still today is the sibling of humankind. Many take seriously their siblinghood to Haloa and the kalo, and from that relationship the rootedness, the oneness to the land, to this home.
In religion, myth, and folklore, it is actually harder to find a creation story that does not include some kind of shared common ancestor than one that does. I’m not even sure if one exists. And the story of our genetics tells much the same tale.
You might remember some years ago when it was announced that humans share a common ancestor, lovingly referred to in genetics at that time as Mitochondrial Eve. Mitochondrial Eve refers to the most recent female common ancestor to all humans living today. People who study this branch, or really root, of genetics like to point out that she was not the only woman in her time, she was not a “new species” or a “new creation.” She was simply the one who drew the card from the genetic deck that led to all of this (indicating all those persons in attendance). Of course, if those scientists were serious about avoiding those inferences about being the only woman or being part of new creations, maybe the name Eve wasn’t the way to go. In that name lies the bias or preference for the Judeo-, Christo-, and Islamic system of belief, which is especially inapt since all signs point to this shared ancestor…coming from the region we call East Africa today, and not from the region we call the Middle East or Europe. Geneticists today prefer another name: “mitochondrial-MRCA” or “mitochondrial-Most Recent Common Ancestor.”
I like to think about our MRCA. I like to imagine her getting a glimpse of how things are going with her children. Do you think she’d be surprised at the number of us today? I think some of us walking around in space or on other heavenly bodies would be a lot to handle. After all, she’s roughly 200,000 years old, older than any interpretation of divinity on earth today. In fact, this ancestor would transcend the very meaning of divine, which means to come from the vine. She is the root in the earth that took hold and divided and divided and divided into us. You might say there is as much holiness in division as there may be in divinity. Yet we are children, products of division.
See, the Gods grew quite scared of our faith and defiance and Thor said,
I’m gonna kill ‘em all with my hammer, like I killed giants.
But Zeus said no, you better let me use my lighting like scissors,
Like I cut the legs of the whales and dinosaurs into lizards,
And so he grabbed up some bolts,
He let out a laugh,
Said I’ll split them right down the middle,
Gonna cut them right up in half.[4]
Gods dividing people, rather than bringing them together: not a new tale. And faiths, and churches, and schools, and governments, and neighborhoods, and train tracks, and gates, and take your pick, depend, rely on division, on separation. You could say it’s our birthright. You could call it our fate. You could call it part of our nature.
But. Here we are. Here we all are, coming together again and again and again. Whatever you like to call this—a service, worship, a talk, “the thing I do for an hour in between early coffee and mid-morning coffee.” And yes, I know some of you think of it like that. This is one of the many ways we come together again, one of the ways we counter that blood-borne division so many know so well. And in a few weeks, at our congregation’s annual meeting, we will come together for one of the extraordinary things we do in a year. We will gather again for our annual meeting to lend our voice to some of the most important ways we stay together, we act together as a community. And at that meeting we will speak together about something that never has caused any division in any community: money.
With the start today of the annual pledge drive, we begin a season of asking ourselves what are our priorities in the coming year. And we did a lot this year together. We finished up three units of housing in the building—certainly a bold move, friends. After a number of years, you decided on a minister—also a bold step for any congregation. But we enter a time that is more than just filling out a pledge form.
Of course, that’s important and part of how we plan, how we provide all we do here to one another, how we can meet the needs of our community and our world. How is important.
But perhaps just as important to consider at this time is the “what.” What are we doing this for? What are we doing here on a Sunday, on all the evenings that so many of us spend here? These weeks when we consider how we are going to make our year work, we have to ask ourselves what it is we want to do. And those aren’t easy questions, right?
Over the past weekend, many of us were right here in this space for the second Jubilee Anti-Racism training this church has hosted in the past two years. And it was different than the first one. First of all, fifty people registered for Jubilee. Fifty people came on the first day, including ten neighbors and friends who do not attend this church. The whole list of people showed up, including almost your entire Board, almost all the Worship Team, and many other groups. And the trainers, after the weekend was over, said that they felt, that they could sense the changes that had already taken place between the two trainings. And some of the lessons we learned, and some of the work we undertook together is taking root. This week, on the agenda at your Worship Team meeting was a discussion of how to move further into building an anti-racist identity into the worship life of this congregation. It’s important to consider the “what” when we are thinking about “how.”
I also know that there are discussions going on already about making anti-racist training a part of the budget, not part of any particular group’s budget, but it’s own line. And you better believe that on the list of ways to become a truly anti-racist community, we must dedicate more than our hopes, our vision, our faith, to this work. It takes dedication of resources, too. Because friends, the work is not done.
Even in the context of our training, there are ways that members of this community are still, still, learning. And there are ways that we are still making mistakes, still causing unnecessary pain to people of color in our community. It even happened this past weekend during our training together. And if you think it’s hard or uncomfortable to hear that from me, if you are feeling a little twinge of sadness or disappointment in hearing this, please, please, please, I beg you, consider what that feeling would be like stretched over weeks, months, years. Try to feel what experiencing real pain at comments or remarks that are made in our community would be like for you. Consider the extra work, extra time, extra teaching, the extraordinary grace that is so regularly a part of the life of people of color in our world, grace that is felt must extended to stay in relationship.
And for those of you who know anything about grace, you know that if you must extend it, it’s not grace. It is something even more selfless, something even more precious, something even more holy. And friends, that kind of pain coupled with that extra work, and the grace that must be given, builds up. And it must, must, must be honored. And blessedly some places are starting to do just that. In fact, at some leading institutions of higher education, faculty of color are now starting to get credit toward tenure because of all the extra time they spend counseling students of color who are experiencing race-based pain and trauma at school. You know something is real and something is serious when it is something that can help get you tenure, friends. It’s a lot of extra work. It makes me wonder whether there should also be a budget line, right next to Jubilee, for an optional retreat for members of color after, or even during, the our next training. “You go on vacation. We’ll do the work.” That would be really, really anti-racist my friends. They’d write articles about us.
Now, what cannot happen today, right after service, is for those who are wondering what happened this past weekend, to spend coffee hour figuring out what happened. Please do not do that today. Find a trusted friend sometime soon and have a conversation, but not today. And what really can’t happen is to crowd or question those who were involved today. That would not be fair. What would be fair, what would make sense, is to attend ADORE on April 28th to discuss some of these questions in greater detail. Or to make an appointment with one of the people on the 8th Principle Task Force to talk more about these questions.
And see, getting us talking about this important work all started with talking about what? Money.
Because any talk about money, is also talk about values. And any church’s annual budget is essentially a map of what that church values. So in the coming weeks, whether over stewardship dinners, at home, in committee meetings, in your dreams, we should all be thinking about what it is we value here. And not only how it is we can accomplish it. Because after the “how,” after the “what,” the real question is “why?” Why are we doing this? Why are we here?
Well, there’s actually simple answer for that. Our mother, the same mother, two hundred thousand years ago, in what we know as East Africa, won. She won the honor. She won the fate. She won the electric touch of years strewn out before her like subjects before their queen, of giving birth to every single one of us.
Before any myths taught of division, before any gods saw fit to favor a whisker on the chin of any son of any man, our mother, our mitochondrial Most Recent Common Ancestor, embodied wholeness. She was “oneness” incarnate.
You ask me how, you ask me what, you ask me why, we must come together at last? Why we must, we must, each one of us, must do better by our siblings? And I tell you: “because mother said so.”
The last time I saw you,
We had just split in two,
You were lookin’ at me,
I was lookin’ at you.
You had a way so familiar,
I could not recognize,
‘Cuz you had blood on your face,
And I had blood in my eyes,
But I could swear by your expression,
That the pain down in your soul was the same
As the one down in mine,
That’s the pain, that cuts a straight line down through your heart,
And we call it love….
That’s the origin of love.[5]
What so many stories of dividing us tell us, is that it is terrible pain to be divided from one another. The creation chant of this aina tells us it is against our very nature to be separate, to be divided. And chances to unite, to come together, to see what must be done are rare. Chances to consider how we do what must be done are precious. And chances to answer the question, “Why am I doing this?” with the only answers that matter:
Because we are siblings,
Because it is the only way to heal the pain down deep in our souls,
Because we need each other,
Because we love each other,
Chances to say these things loudly and then to practice what we preach are chances we will not have forever.
Fortune, the wealth of spirit we yearn for, favors the bold:
Fortune favors those who do more than yearn for what we want: to boldly grow compassion, justice, and joy.
Fortune favors those who seek out how we will do these things in the coming weeks: through devoted, consistent, and wholly embodied commitment.
And fortune favors those who answer why we do this work together: “Because this is a holy place and because I love you.”
And may it ever be so.
[1] “The Origin of Love” from Hedwig and the Angry Inch by Stephen Trask.
[2] Symposium by Plato, trans. Benjamin Jowett located at http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/symposium.html.
[3] The Kumulipo, translated by Queen Liliuokalani (1897), located at http://www.sacred-texts.com/pac/lku/. See chapter entitled “A Branch of the Twelfth Era.”
[4] “The Origin of Love” by Trask.
[5] “The Origin of Love” by Trask.
What if hope and attention fuel our power for real change? How do we deepen the wells that provide sources of hope for ourselves and others? What do you hope will change for the better this year? Join us to light a spark in the way you think about hope in the days to come.
Have you ever been at the beach, when the waves are so forbidding that the farthest you want to wade in is about to your ankles, maybe your calves? On Thursday afternoon at Waimea, the waves were like that. I was actually there long enough to watch the sets of waves get higher and higher. When I arrived they were cresting about at the shoulders of the surfers out on the water. But by the time I was leaving, they were well over the heads of the surfers. And all of this might have been warning enough—it was for me. But luckily, along with the thunder issuing forth from the crashing waves, and the concussion of waves making landfall, warning all who approached, there was also a helpful loudspeaker operated by someone I have to assume was a lifeguard, though he sounded more like a sports commentator. And the sport he was commenting on was the sport of keeping people safe and keeping people slightly, just slightly, shamed. But he sure did it with style.
When I arrived, parking far from the loudspeakers, I could just make out his plea to parents with young children…that was delivered like this.
Parents of young children in the water, I can see you. If you’d like directions to a safer beach, please come see us at the lifeguard station. This is not a safe beach for children.
And after getting settled in he was continually keeping everyone updated about where to swim and when. With access to buoys sensing the water far out to sea, he could tell when bigger or smaller waves were coming to shore. So we’d all hear messages like this.
OK, folks, if you want to get in a water here right by the lifeguard stand, it will be fine for a little while.
And it all went on like that for a time. But then a few really big sets of waves came crashing in, and we were warned to simply get out of the water. And that’s when the speaker stopped addressing all of us, and started talking to just one person.
Swimmer, we see you, someone is coming out to get you.
And then racing down the beach we saw a lifeguard holding two fins and yellow foam floatation device. The lifeguard ran right at the water and really bounded into the crushing surf holding the fins. Then the guard got them on and started paddling out through the sets of waves, swimming right into the highest waves, up and over, up and over. And as all of us on the crowded beach watched in silence, or mumbled lowly about the fate of the swimmer or the bravery of guard, we heard it,
See folks, this is not a beach for beginners. You need two fins and a lot of experience at this beach to be out there.
By this time, virtually everyone was a few feet from the reach of the waves coming ashore. The warnings and the now evident danger beat us back to the drier sand. And not long after that a second guard took to the water with a surfboard under his arm. He paddled out to the swimmer and other lifeguard to aid in the rescue, which we all could tell was not going well. But we watched as the person we’d only known as “the swimmer” was loaded on to the front of the board and was moving to shore under the power of his own arms and those of his rescuer’s. But he got tired, this boy who’d been bobbing for so long in the surf, and we saw him stop paddling. And that’s when we heard it again.
Hey victim, how ‘bout some strokes. Let’s see some paddling there.
I’m sure against the evident exhaustion and the fear he was experiencing, this galling suggestion over the speaker wasn’t a welcome one, but it helped. When he began to aid in the strokes, he got to shore pretty quickly. And we all applauded. Maybe we clapped for the swimmer safe on shore. Maybe we clapped for the bravery, cunning, and strength of the guards. Or maybe, just maybe we clapped for the deadpan commentator on the loudspeaker.
What struck me was the sight of seeing Waimea so crowded with sunbathers and onlookers, crowded with boogie boarders and surfers out in the water, yet only two among us, two guards, had the power and the authority to save the bobbing boy and gather him with them to shore.
In this month, we are looking at the ways that balance may be in our lives or the ways that balance maybe should come into our lives. And so it’s fitting that we celebrate this day of welcoming new members right after the earth once more shifts its balance upon its axis just enough to move us into the elongation of days over the coming season. In some other parts of the world, this is the time of year when rains or showers become more common than the snows that were blanketing town and villages. But on this island where we are, many of us know that the season of rain is actually past now.
For the past few weeks I know you’ve seen it too. The sky streaked in the bold bows of color happens less often now. The green of the undulating mountains, the rich comfort of the grassy patches around beach areas, in many ways the rains have done what we love so much: made this place about as lush and vibrant as we ever get to see it.
But what about the lushness that we don’t get to see from our cars, around golf courses, padding past sandy areas onto the grass? What about the lushness of the sea itself? That is what our phenomenal ukulele choir, pop-up choir, and the seemingly boundlessly talented Imiloa showed us in our story and our song welcoming our new members gathered to our shores here.
Limu describes a number of the important plants in the sea. I know that in some places the word seaweed is used, and though I am sure that word is fine for people who like to pronounce the vowel sound “ee” as often as possible, why wouldn’t we use the rich, round, beautiful sounding word like limu? In the song we heard, we learned about the different kinds of limu that need to be gathered.[1] One of the first ones the song mentions is limu lipoa. Limu lipoa comes from the sea in its subtidal regions. It has leaf-like branches and has a spicy flavor and is used in stews, especially. And it has a strong, characteristic odor.
Another we heard about is the limu kohu, which is roughly translated as the supreme limu. Rather than growing like the leaves of a tree, limu kohu is a creeping vine. After it attaches and begins to creep along a rock, small shoots come up from the creeper. These shoots are what are harvested.[2] Limu kohu is used in small portions because the flavor is powerful. It’s often added to poke and other things to give it a kick.
I know I’m focusing a little more on food than I usually do. I promise, it’s not because I forgot to have breakfast. But as someone who has a plant-based diet, reading about plants with such strong and powerful flavors gets me pretty jazzed. I like to imagine the minerals the plant collects in its growing, how those minerals are arranged and mixed, to create a unique and unexpected flavor. Limu are among the most nutritionally dense foods you can eat, with minerals unavailable in the same concentrations in plants on land.
Remember, I had to, that when the verse in our song talks about the plants growing on the rocks of the ocean, and swaying ready to be picked, they aren’t rocks exposed to the air and swaying in the breeze. They are rocks under the water and the plants are swaying in the undulating currents. That current draws us to and fro, up and over, in the ocean. That current gathers the nutrients and the fish to the limu. That current moves the vastly greater part of the face of our earth in a constant flowing motion. And so it is that currents of time, of space, of destiny have brought our new members into our space today to be with us so that we can welcome them home.
Many people know how often I say that for some of us, a Unitarian Universalist community was the last house on the block. We’d tried, and left, tried, and, left, too and fro, too and fro, different faiths, churches, beliefs, never finding one where we can be truly ourselves and then be loved and accepted for it. We knew the rough waters, like the limu kohu, which grows best in those dangerous, choppy waters, but whose flavor is so worth the time and attention it takes to safely secure these limu. Maybe for those of us like this, who’d seen some rough going where faith was concerned, this was the last house on the block.
And then others, whose deep roots, far beneath the tides, knew the rock to which they’d hold fast, like the limu lipoa, a Unitarian Universalist community was the only place that ever made sense in the first place. For them, our community, this faith, might wall have been the first house on the block.
Lucky for all of us, especially for those of us mixing our metaphors right now, our house, this house, is literally the last and the first house on our block! And this is why welcome is so, so, so important to us here.
Because whether this is the last place left or the only place we’d ever want to go, the same thing is true: many of us need to be here. After the harrowing adventures of life, after the raging and surging that the storms gather into our lives, after the rain comes, after the rain goes, the sun shone warm on the shore where we stand and consider how best to bring the beautiful fruit from the sea once more.
When the bobbing boy, the swimmer, the reluctant paddler, the victim, came ashore, a small group of about four boys was waiting for him closer to the shoreline than others were standing. When the boy on the board exited the ocean amid the wash of applause, I watched one pat his shoulder and some others simply stood by. I couldn’t hear them and I couldn’t see their faces really. But I can gather a lot of what they were discussing. What happened, where you scared, did you ever think you’d come back? And then, came running another boy, across our field of vision and over to the boy come ashore, the running boy outstretched his arms to embrace his friend with a hug. But at the last minute, the boy who survived the ordeal didn’t return the hug and the running boy just sort of stood there. I get it. Not everyone is a hugger. But it was a little awkward, and the running boy just stood there with his arms out anyway. Then like someone had shown him once years ago how best to gather those things you love to you, and beckoned a little more with his hands, as if to say, c’mon, get in here, and the named victim, shamed into paddling harder, relented and embraced his young friend. And somehow there was relief in that. Like the ordeal hadn’t really ended until someone’s open arms welcomed him back.
The balance that comes when we bring new souls into this community is the kind of balance that our earth demands. It’s inevitable as far as anyone can tell. One of our six sources of knowledge and wisdom in this tradition are the spiritual teachings of Earth-centered traditions which celebrate the sacred circle of life and instruct us to live in harmony with the rhythms of nature. I really do love our tradition. And the rhythm that comes once again this past week is the rhythm that swings us back toward the lengthening days of these lives we lead together. When we bring new folks into our community, we are blessed with the chance to re-balance ourselves once again.
Maybe we are welcoming someone who has known the churning waters where the limu kohu thrives and grows, whose flavor when it is added to meals is penetrating and powerful.
Maybe we are welcoming someone who has known the quiet waters where the limu lipoa sways and grows from deep roots, whose flavor is more moderate, but still has plenty of spice.
Or maybe we are welcoming someone who was drowning, who was grasping for life in and unforgiving sea, who needs a lot of help to come ashore again, who might be so ashamed that they can hardly handle a hug.
No matter where you are in that ocean, one of the great calls of Unitarian Universalism is to come out after the rains and see who needs gathering, to sense how best we can bring all who seek together, and to welcome you home.
Whether you are a lifeguard, whether you are standing, watching, clapping, whether you are there for hugs and understanding, or whether you’re the one with the microphone, we are all here to welcome you home.
And may it always be so.
[1] Much of this information in this section comes directly from www.hawaii.edu/reefalgae/publications/ediblelimu. Be sure to visit the site for more on this vastly interesting topic.
[2] Limu kohu now only grows on Kaua’i and Ni’ihau.
Hurricanes can be fun. I learned this at a young age. In the early eighties, I was living with my family in Connecticut in a house where only the main road and a creepy old graveyard, with a gate too hard to operate without pinching tiny fingers, lay between the Long Island Sound and the beginning of our property line. Reports came in that a hurricane was making its way up the eastern coastline. Our family watched the news, which was only on a few times a day then. We listened to the radio, and then we made a plan. My folks decided we would evacuate.
Now, I want to be clear about what evacuation meant in Connecticut in the early eighties. We gathered our pajamas, our sleeping bags, and our toothbrushes, and we ventured about five miles in the station wagon to the next town to stay with my parents’ good friends who had kids we liked a lot. My parents’ friends were in fact the friends who introduced my parents to one another, so the eldest daughter, who is two years older than I am, and who is still one of my best friends today, likes to tell people that we have been friends since I was negative two.
So we might not have been evacuating in the ways we see sometimes on the television news, but being away from the coastline and from our house with a lot of trees overhead made sense. Our friends’ mom was really creative and fun. She had plans for all of the kids to help with. I remember doing things, like collecting candles, finding all the flashlights and all the batteries. I’m sure we saved some water, too. But when all the chores were done, more of what I remember is waiting for things to stop working, you know? I remember wanting to see the electricity to go out, to see some trees tossed to the ground, to see the roads turned to channels for streams of water that weren’t there before. I wanted to see a little chaos, a little destruction. I felt a kind of awe in the presence of something so powerful that it could make the lights go out, make the trees sway past breaking, and make water run through the streets of town. And I was going to get to see it all happen.
Now that I am older and can reflect on that day, three things strike me. First, the fun of coming together to help protect each other is really something beautiful. In the face of danger, being together made us all less afraid. And that is really one of the most important parts of that entire experience for me. Second, this early experience with nature and its power is one that has stayed with me. Nature is one of the great reminders that we are in fact human, and we are mostly powerless over winds that might fell trees and snap power lines, not to mention floods that might overflow ancient graveyards to reach my front door. And third, children, at least this child, at times, are the most adorable, enigmatic, little psychopaths we might ever meet. Who else sits and waits for destruction to happen around them?
Now, I do not mean to poke fun. Psychopathy is not a laughing matter. But even experts in this field acknowledge that many of the traits associated with psychopaths survive in small measure in many adults to lesser degrees. In an article by Barbara Bradley Hagerty in The Atlantic a few years ago, she explained that “certain psychopathic traits have survived because they’re useful in small doses: the cool dispassion of a surgeon, the tunnel vision of an Olympic athlete, the ambitious narcissism of many a politician.”[1] Odd that she doesn’t mention the curious second grader who just wants to see the lights go out and the trees come down, but I bet that’s in there, too. I think something else was going on through that storm though.
In the years I’ve lived since second grade, like many of us, and especially in a place that has experienced truly land altering weather and geologic changes, we understand the difference between the storms we see coming and the storms we don’t. The storms we see coming are communal events in many ways. We would wait and wait to see if school will be closed. We gather canned goods, bottled water, and cash. We talk with each other about all about our preparations to withstand the storm. And then in many cases, not a whole lot happens, but we are together in the preparation, sleeping bags, toothbrushes, and pajamas at the ready. We are ready for those storms we see coming. But what about those storms we don’t?
With satellites streaming Doppler and other tools, the discipline of predicting weather has changed. More or less we know when things will be rolling in. Sometimes we get a surprise, but we usually get a warning to evacuate these days, that is if you don’t live on, say, an island. But weather does not hold the only storms we face together. There are other storms in our lives.
Someone snakes the spot we are angling for at Costco. Someone makes that terrible entrance from University on to H-1 East a lot closer than is comfortable. Someone bumps into us on the sidewalk because they are looking at their phone and trying to walk. I am just listing things that happened to me this week here, I confess. But when things like this happen, another kind of storm gathers strength. And I’m not only speaking metaphorically. Some psychologists call what happens at these times a limbic storm, when the amygdala lights up and we respond to threats or danger in a range of ways, perhaps with a dignified “Excuse me” or maybe with a less dignified response while safely encased in the hermetic seal of our car at Costco. However they pop up, these little thunder bursts, these storms, are a part of our daily lives, especially in a place where people drive like they do here.
But psychologists, along with the rest of the world, are also concerned with what happens when larger, more dangerous storms rage through people. This week, the nation of New Zealand joined the siblinghood of places where attacks on people singled out for their religious beliefs lay waste to the lives of the innocent for too many and to the innocence of life for everyone else. But sadly, tragically, events like the attack on two mosques in Christchurch are not new. You don’t have to read very far in the Hebrew Scriptures to find a man in a rage who kills his brother. There are a lot of other terrible things that happen in those books that men—and to be clear, in those books, like today, it is mostly men—but there are terrible things that people blame on some kind of emotion that took over them, like a storm that they could not tame. And the same is true in many, many cultures.
There is the story of Kahalaopuna from the first Hawaiian faith, who was a direct ancestor of the Manoa ridge back and the red lehua trees. Kahalaopuna was engaged to Kahui of the powerful family that ran what is now Waikiki. And some of their male associates thought it fun to suggest to Kahui that they had enjoyed the company of Kahalaopuna in the past. Kauhi became so enraged that he violently killed Kahalaopuna. But after he buried her body near Kaala, the tallest mountain on the island, her spirit floated to the top of the lehua tree to tell her tale to passersby. And when her parents learned of this violence, they located their daughter’s grave and restored her to life.[2]
Sadly there is scarcely a culture that does not have stories like these. Of course, when something is only a story, it has the wonderful potential to teach those who seek to learn a way of living that is restorative and meaningful. History is different, of course. Though we can learn from history, the tragedy of so many instances when the storms of emotion overcome people is that real people, ancestors of our humanity, lose their safety, their security, or even their lives because of it. And like so many of the facts of our own history, our own existence, these same themes seem to be echoing out from our history. As Mark Twain is often credited with saying: “History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.”[3]
Today we hear real news of storms raging worse and worse across the globe, more catastrophically impacting the lives of us here on this planet, and most catastrophically impacting the lives of the global poor on this planet. And yet we have political leaders who deny that there is anything we can do about it, before the storm. They seem to want to wait by the window like a strange child who wonders what will happen rather than doing anything to help. And again this week we have the real news of the destruction by so many males—and again, it is usually males—that comes from rage breaking forth like clouds rolling over a mountain and ravaging lives amid the thunderclap of firearms, becoming all too familiar in the lives of humans who seek to practice their faith in peace. And yet too many political leaders fail, fail, and fail again to take action before the storm, even though it’s a storm we all see coming. And these are not the only kinds of storms we know. They are only the ones whose destruction is so direct and obvious.
I have a friend who talks often of his love for the sound of lightly falling rain outside his window. He even plays recordings of light rainfall to help him relax. And it’s not too far a leap to learn about those times when he suffers with bouts of depression, when the light rainfall settles into his own soul for a while. And there are so many other ways that the lighting that flashes, neuron to neuron, leaping the distance across synapses in our bodies, in our brains, racing, raging, through our mostly liquid water forms, bring crashes of thunder to our inner selves, where literally a storm brews in our own minds. It comes sometimes as rage, sure. But the storm comes as embarrassment, shame, and longing. It comes as loss, disappointment, and want. There are times when thinking of what goes on in my head, as weather systems we see before us, makes more sense to me than centuries of psychology science has ever explained. And on this I know I’m not alone.
Because roaring through the pages of history and literature and religion are story after story after story of the storms we all have known. The oldest preserved piece of written literature pretty much anywhere, The Epic of Gilgamesh from ancient Mesopotamia, contains some very human storms in the lives of the heroes of that story. But a massive flood, a deluge, eerily, if not intentionally, similar to the one Noah had to navigate, drives much of the climax of the story. And stories of storms are about as common in religion and literature as just about any other motif. But like so, so, so many of the stories, it’s not the storm that matters at all. It’s what happened before the storm that counts.
Do you gather round you those closest to you, or at least the animals, two-by-two? Do you seek out the ways to see, even if the lights all go out? Do you find or build a shelter safe from the storm? Do you plan to make cookies and just decide to eat the dough when the electricity fails? Sorry, I was just having a flashback to that hurricane in my childhood.
We heard from Michael today about Hawaii Men’s Shed and the ways that his group navigates the uncharted waters of so many whose lives seem to change overnight.
Way over yonder
Is a place that I know
Where I can find shelter
From a hunger and cold.
And we talked about those ways that storms gather in our own souls.
When the night is cloudy
There is still a light that shines of me
Shine on till tomorrow
Let it be, let it be.
And we wonder together at the ways that we as children can see our way in the storm, keep away from the trees that can’t stand any more, and stay safe from the flood cresting the banks below the ancient graveyard and stretching across the street to our front door.
Make channels for the streams of love.
Because here’s the thing. In this month of balance, when we consider what it means to be pono, in right relationship. when we look that the sense of kaulike and balance what we need in our lives to be able to weather all that we face, we can learn so much from the natural world we inhabit, that with the right community gathered together, with the right preparations made together, and with shelter that can withstand the storm together, lightning that drives through the waters to rumble out a thunderous clap, need not lay waste to entire communities.
Pain, the storms in our minds and bodies, which might hurt to hold inside, need not lay waste to any more lives. We can honor more fully the wonder of nature, the universal experience of human pain, when, and really only when, we have done all, all, all, we can before the storm, to be sure that our siblings around the world, and in our shared community, and under our very roof, gathered together through he storm, are safe, are protected, are loved.
Then, and really only then, the storms we know can pour out blessings upon this earth we share.
And may it always be so.
[1] Barbara Bradley Hagerty, “When Your Child Is a Psychopath,” The Atlantic, June, 2017.
[2] Martha Beckwith, Hawaiian Mythology (Honolulu: Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1970), p. 152. University of Hawaii reprinted this text from its original publication in 1940 by Yale University Press for Vassar College.
[3] Investigators of attribution cannot actually locate a place where Twain said this.
When closely held values of democracy, justice, and fair play are under regular attack what can we do? How does our faith guide our actions? And how can we find the virtue in fortitude?
Growing up, a lot of the stories I heard were about animals. Some of the most beloved characters in literature are nonhuman animals who act a lot like human animals. I remember one in particular: The Fox and the Hound.
One of the moments in the story that is indelible for me was when the two characters Tod, the fox, and Copper, the hound dog meet. Tod sort of plainly states, “I’m a fox.” And sort of out of nowhere, Copper, responds very boisterously, “I’m a hound dog.” It was memorable, clearly.
But following each character’s self-revelation, the action of the story unfolds. The juvenile animals become fast friends. And not long after that, we get one of those “move the plot along” montages while a song entitled “Best of Friends” plays in the background. We see the horseplay and fun, and we see the tenderness and care that develops between the young friends. It’s sweet.
But then, forces in their lives convince them that rather than friends, they are supposed to be mortal enemies. Even the wise old owl, Tod’s adoptive mother, explains that this is just the way of the world. And there the sweetness turns to tragedy. Fate or circumstance, maybe even genetics, maybe even misdirected or unreturned affection, if we really want to play cultural critic, tear their friendship apart. The dramatic device at the heart of the drama is this: the common perception by a society that the fates of these two animals are sealed by their very nature.
As a matter of scientific fact, hound dogs and foxes aren’t that far away from each other on the tree of life. One primary difference is the domestication of dogs and the lack of domestication of foxes. In fact, foxes tend to be recluse and solitary, avoiding humans as much as they can. Of course domestication on its own is not a genetic trait. It’s a way of describing a set of behaviors and outcomes, a set of expressions of the animal’s genetics. And the fate of these animals seems sealed by these outcomes.
But there is a special group of foxes that has become more and more distinct from their fellow foxes over time. I don’t mean over millions of years. I mean over the past few decades. See, in the 1960s, when a Soviet geneticist Dmitry Belyayev refused to believe some of the theories of more respected, higher-ranking scientists, he got, shall we say, reassigned to a very cold place. Far away from many of his superiors, he began experiments in breeding based on some of his observations of the wildlife around him. And what drew his fascination were domestic traits he’d noticed in some foxes.
His question was whether by selecting the foxes exhibiting these traits for breeding, generation over generation over generation, could he bring about a fox that is domesticated, that likes to be around humans? Like a hound dog. Well the answer is yes.
And after decades he created a species of fox that comes when its called, that retrieves toys, that likes to snuggle up with their humans. But that wasn’t all that happened. By performing this generations-long experiment, Belyayev was surprised to discover that subtle physical traits began to be expressed alongside the traits that seemed to control temperament. After more and more generations of the less wild, more dependent foxes were bred, the foxes began to get slightly more floppy years, not the kind of alert ears we are used to seeing on foxes. They began to get curly tails, the kind we like so much on our puppies. More and more, these foxes started to act like and to look like some of the more common breeds of dogs we all know and love. Some in the scientific community call this experiment the greatest experiment in selective breeding ever. Others remarked that Belyayev made the single greatest contribution to solving the mystery of how dogs were domesticated into companion animals for humans. And still others are just jazzed that they can have a fox as a pet now. Of course, at $9,000 each, they are not for everyone.
But if the wise old owl, who told the fox and the hound that they could not be together because of their very genetic make-up, was just a little more up on her Cold-War era Soviet research, maybe Tod and Copper could have lived happily ever after instead of trying to kill each other, as nature thought was intended.
Today while we bless so many of the lives that make our lives better, we have a chance to behold something of the wild in our midst. Isn’t some of the fun of having a non-human animal around watching what on earth they are doing, how they are responding to the world they inhabit now, and wondering what could have formed the impulse or the reason for what it is they do? Many assume that these habits come from a time and a place where they made sense, but on this island, in the constant vigilant protection of a human animal, they don’t any more.
Yet there they are, the wild things that remind us of something, perhaps, in ourselves once upon a time, before we had become so well-mannered, so well-adjusted to this life we have built for ourselves and for each other, before the wild things in ourselves slumbered upon mattresses and pillows, journeyed long distances…in cars and airplanes, gathered food…at Foodland, before human animals were civilized, domesticated, brought to heel, not by a few decades of selective breeding, but by millennia of it.
And in the last few millennia, one of the forces that seemed most concerned with the remaking of the human…has been religion.
Indeed, loud voices proclaim that religion itself was a product of a time when humans were facing a wild world they could hardly understand. So it was religion that sought to explain, comfort, make sense of the wild world we inhabited together. Many, if not all, of the world’s deepest, oldest faiths, attach meaning to geologic, astrophysical, or weather based phenomena because these were the kinds of wild, untamable things that threatened them. And often the bridge between the human and the divine, the way to appease or cleanse the relationship between the human and the divine, lay squarely, where? With nonhuman animals.
Through writings, through excavation, through legend and story, the relationship through time of humans to their companions on this earth is filled with sacred and powerful relationships. Long before the ancient god of the Hebrew people was said to grant dominion or responsibility to humans, ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and other communities were exhibiting both the importance of domesticated animals in their daily lives and the importance of those same animals in their sacred lives. Some animals were worshiped as gods or as worldly vessels of the divine. Others simply played a role in allowing humans to stay in one place for a longer time, rather than roving nomadically. Some were sacrificed in rituals meant to appease the divine, to smooth things over between humans and what was out of their control.
But through the generations, through the conquering, the taking, the dominance of culture after culture, something began to happen in all this worship. In many of the most dominant cultures on the planet a relatively new idea of a god emerged—the idea of a single, great, all powerful, all knowing, unknowable God took hold in the religions of the Abrahamic faiths held by those who wielded the most power in the world. And it was when the idea of such a powerful god took hold that the questions started for some. Some humans who were thinking critically, if not philosophically, wondered, “What on earth could we possibly do to impact or affect such a powerful being?” “Why would a god so powerful care that this one goat was made a sacrifice in its name?”
In a polytheistic faith, gods can be jealous and jockey for supremacy. They can act out in surprising ways to gain more power over other gods. But not when there is just the one, all-powerful idea of God. The competition was over.
For many it was the generations and generations of an idea of a god that grew larger and larger and more powerful that led some humans to come to the conclusion that human actions could not meaningfully influence such a god to view us differently or not. For some, this idea of a god became so distant and unknowable, that it made as much sense to them to conclude that there is no god. And that is what many did.
Today, among the sources of this, our Living Tradition, are the teachings of those who viewed the world’s organized, ritualized faiths, and found them wanting: the humanist, the non theist, the atheist. They found faiths wanting not only of reason, but wanting of real compassion for the full breadth of the lives that are interconnected in the universe. They found them wanting not only of proof, but wanting of the reverence for what we doknow of the natural universe, and awe for what we do notknow. They found those faiths wanting not only of sincerity, but wanting of the wonder contained in facing honestly and sometimes painfully, questions of evil, justice, and responsibility. It is from the teachings of many of these brave souls that many humans stopped searching for the best ways to mediate between the wildness of the world and some divine force causing it, and to experience it firsthand, themselves. And perhaps more importantly, they began the work of breaking down the all-too-prevalent myths of superiority of one kind of life over another that are rampant in the stories forming the foundation of many faiths that are used so often as a reason or apology for why humans oppress other lives, as an explanation for why they are given over to some kind of wild, untamable passion, or how they received some kind of divine privilege to do so. So central to the teachings of our atheist and non-theist siblings is the work of taking the responsibility ascribed to a supreme all powerful god in the stories written millennia ago, and placing responsibility for human action, for the care-taking of where the wild things are in our own animal make up, squarely where the responsibility should be: in the palm of our hands.
In the 1960s the experiment began. The banished, hopeful adventurers wondered together what it would mean to set in motion generations of decisions that would help to bring about the most pronounced, effective traits in the subjects of the experiment. The ideas of Unitarians and Universalists, wild in many ways to those watching this experiment, likely wondered what would happen when all the wild things are in one place together, when humanists and atheists sit beside Christians and Jews, and seek together what might be shared, what could be common, what will be, in a word, blessed.
And what will the world say, hen over time, through generations of new beginnings, when this place, where selfless love of others, where dedication to the cause of justice for all, where devotion to the sacredness of creation reigns supreme, becomes the outward expression of our belief or non-belief in something greater than ourselves? For truly, where would anyone rather be after this week, than in a place where we know truly that you do not have to think alike, you do not have to believe alike, you do not have to walk alike, or bark alike, to love alike.
You may be a fox. You may be a hound dog. But you are home, in this place, where the personal things you believe or don’t believe are valued, where the public things you do in the world matter as much as what you believe about the world, where the private things, what might have kept you apart, separate from others, can be healed by a community of understanding, of acceptance, of care.
You are home here, where the wild things are. And may it always be so.
So sang Bo Diddley more than 50 years ago – but try as we might, we both judge and are judged in all kinds of ways. Cognitive scientists say assigning basic categories is part of how we simplify the world so that we’re not overwhelmed – a tree is not a cloud is not a puppy… But what if categories that seem so obvious aren’t necessarily so? Are little girls really made of sugar and spice and what’s wrong with boys liking pink? Join us for a gentle exploration of gender identity and a personal journey down “Clueless Lane.”
Sometimes life just isn’t fair, right? Seems like sometimes no matter where you go, someone’s right around the corner waiting to get over on you. Sometimes it feels like you’re not even safe from this right in your own neighborhood. I learned this firsthand a few months ago. It was a beautiful, bright June morning. It was actually King Kamehameha Day, when I arrived home from coffee with some friends. And I felt pretty lucky that morning because I found a parking space close to my house. Usually there were temporary signs on little sawhorses posted by this spot restricting parking there for construction vehicles, but it was a Kamehameha Day miracle: there were no signs up this morning.
And I thought, “Wow, I like how seriously people take this holiday.” But then on the way to my apartment, I noticed that the signs that used to be up werethere, but they were face down by the curb. And when I saw this, there was a little, tiny twinge in the reason portion of my brain that wondered if those signs were taken down by the construction company with the license to use them, or by some enthusiastic revelers who knew that the next day was a holiday, and not a workday. But the sure and abiding faith I had in this holiday and what I understood to be the lifting of the parking restrictions on this day, overrode any twinge of worry. And besides, if someone saw my car there, and saw the signs were down, they wouldn’t dream of putting the signs back up next to my car…and then be monster enough to have my car ticketed or towed, right?
And so it was a few hours later, into this blissful holiday mood in my apartment, maybe enjoying some iced coffee, that the faint call of tiny trumpets intruded, tiny trumpets better known as a car alarm, but the brief protest of the alarm ended quickly, and besides, I didn’t recognize it as my own. But again, for an instant, I had the fleeting sense that it might be my Malibu’s call of distress, but again I rested confident in the idea that this holiday meant my car was safe from attack.
So it was when I went to my car to meet a friend for coffee, when that sinking, awful feeling, lurched in my belly, as all the tiny twinges I ignored all came to be, when there was no car in the spot. But there they were. Along the curb, someone, a monster, replaced the “No Parking” signs that were down, including one right next to where my car used to be. It was just sitting there, silently mocking me, scorning me, one of the sawhorses of the apocalypse.
Maybe it was fitting that this occurred in June, when the earth is at its maximum tilt toward the sun, when there is the least amount of balance between the night and the day, when the Earth is at one of two of the most precarious angles of the year spinning through space. It was far from the time of year we celebrate today, the time of year when we are called again to consider balance between the night and the day, between the faces of the earth and the faces of our own community.
This is my favorite kind of holiday. There are many kinds of holidays or celebrations we enjoy together. Some like King Kamehameha Day might be a fixed date, but it is celebrated on a particular day so it can be most effectively commemorated with parades, or feasts, or with the well-known and well-loved tradition of tipping over “No Parking” signs. These are the kind of holidays that are very human. They are attached to a date in a calendar created by humans and have some wiggle room in when they’re really celebrated.
But an equinox is not like that. Neither is a solstice. These are events that happen at a fixed point in time and space. The equinox happens to us. We don’t pick the day or the hour to commemorate it. It just happens to us at a fixed instant. There is an astrophysical certainty to the moment, down to the atomic second when the equinox happens. Google tells us it was 3:54 pm yesterday, here in Hawaii. And no matter where else you were in the universe at that time, that is the instant it happened. Isn’t that kind of relaxing—the same event happening to all the people at exactly the same time?
Maybe it’s so relaxing or maybe it stands out a little because this kind of treatment, the same thing happening to all the people of the earth at the same time, seems somehow only to be possible by things as powerful as the star at the center of our solar system or the forces that fling our earth, wobbling from axis to axis, around this system at mind bending speed. Only things this powerful, it seems, can accomplish the feat of impacting all the world in exactly the same way.
Because the world, most of us know, the world we think of as part of what humans are doing on it and to it is not living into this lesson of balance. Taking questionable towing practices out of the discussion for the moment, there are vastly more painful and pronounced examples of this imbalance surrounding us every day. But let’s look at just one that was in the news this week.
Many of us saw stories this week about where we are as an economy ten years after the great economic meltdown of 2008. That meltdown might have been one of the more disgusting human-created events, born of the unholy union of unquenchable greed and unconscionable morals. And on its anniversary recognized this week, many outlets ran stories with sort of a then vs. now spin. But the bulk of what I read had one message that kept coming through: people on the whole did not recover from that collapse as well as many economic indicators might tell us. Yes, the stock market has roared back, but the lives of the people who live in this country did not. And it is no mystery why this is the case.
We have seen, we have felt, we have lived, for an entire decade, in the reason why this disparity exists. The stock market is roaring back because the lives of many people are not getting better. See, the ways that more employers began treating more employees after 2008 was with the very clear message that “You should just be happy you have a job. Look around you. People are out of work everywhere.” Many employers used this as a chance to cut payrolls, cynically, even when their company was not affected directly by the downturn, and companies heaped more and more responsibilities on employees who stayed, sometimes combining two jobs into one, and expecting those “lucky enough” to have their jobs to do both jobs. Many businesses were remade in this way in 2008, and many have not changed much, aside from being more profitable and more of an awful place to work. And when you add the erosion in many states of any kind of public option of healthcare, employers continue to gain power and advantage not only over employees, but over the very health of employees’ families. And so it remains out of balance. And sometimes, individuals react in funny ways to the imbalances we feel. And I am not immune.
See, since King Kamehameha Day, I have to own up to doing a little bit of backsliding. For those of you unfamiliar with the more evangelical strands of the tapestry of faith in this country, “backsliding” means returning to some of our old ways we used to take part in before we found a new way. See, after my car was towed I sent a very nice letter to the construction company suggesting there was a misunderstanding and that they might consider reimbursing me for the cost of the tow. They didn’t answer.
So I sent a second letter to the company, all beginning with “Aloha” and ending with “Mahalo,” all only one page, just a few well-reasoned paragraphs, maintaining that I believe this might have been an oversight that can easily be corrected. They didn’t answer again.
So 1, 2, skip a few, let’s flash forward to this past Thursday morning, when I walked into Courtroom 10A at 1111 Alakea street to plead my case before a judge. But when I walked into court Thursday, I was not alone. The clerk was there in her spot by the bench. And there was another person there, earlier than I was to court.
I sat toward the back of the courtroom. He was seated almost in front. And I watched as he took out his cellphone. He took pictures of the legal papers he had with him, and I could tell he was smiling when he did. Not something you see every day in court. Then he raised his cell phone to eye level, switched the phone to “selfie” mode, and he made sure to get as much of the courtroom and the entrance to the courtroom in the shot as he could before he smiled real big and took his selfie.
And something quiet in my mind, not unlike what told me I might reconsider my parking job said, “That’s my guy.” And when the clerk asked him what case he was there for it became clear we were on opposing sides of the case. This was the guy I’d hauled into court. This was my monster. And when he realized who I was, he came right over to me, he put out his hand, and he smiled and grinned like a kid, like the kid we are all inside, and he said, “I’m sorry about all if this. And I’m sorry about not responding to your letters.”
And then we talked for about fifteen minutes about pretty much everything other than this case: what it’s like being a commercial contractor in Honolulu, what it was like to go from lawyer to minister, real stuff. And in the end he confessed that he knew skipping the court date would have been the wiser strategy, but he really came down to the courthouse for the fun of it.
I wish I could tell you all of what happened after that, but the mediation process we both agreed to enter requires confidentiality for all that went on during the mediation. But I can tell you that outside of the mediation, after getting to know each other a little bit, and even after tangling a little with me over arguments and numbers and how things would go for him at trial, my adversary, my faceless monster and I settled the case…but not before he tried to hire me as his lawyer.
One of the things that can get confusing in our daily work together, in the challenges we face, the imbalances we experience, the seeming forces that oppose us at times, is the challenge of asking whether it is other people, individuals, who present opposition to what it is we want to do, or whether the very field of play we are on is skewed or unfair, pitched against us somehow.
The Unitarian Universalist movement has been focused for some time on the question of this field. We have been asked nationally, and here at this church, to look intensely at systemic racism and the oppressive forces of white supremacy culture at work, in play, on this soil. Sure, we can look at the lingering effects of the past ten years, but that is really like looking at a few of a team’s seasons rather than the entire history of a sport. Theologians, economists, and more than a few scholars of history suggest that America’s soil, the fields where the worst, the perhaps unredeemable actions, of a capitalist regime played out, might never be healed without wholesale, massive acts of reconciliation and even reparation. They suggest that we need to change entirely the game that has been stacked against members of our society, and in particular those members whose forebears were subjected to the institution of slavery, in real and tangible ways—not in ways that can be defunded, overturned, or turned to a political game.
And the reason they say this is not only to try to right one of the most horrific wrongs in history. They suggest that the impact this work will have on the soul of the entire nation, the entire capital system we live in, would be hugely beneficial for everyone in the system. The entire field of play would be altered for everyone forever, approaching the balance once again this day reminds us is possible.
In our shared belief in the inherent worth and dignity of every person and its twin belief that we are part of an interconnected whole, there lies a very hard proposition to accept. Even those who take advantage of others, who misuse power to gain advantage over others, who want things out of balance, some Unitarian Universalists would argue, our First Principle to affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity of all, suggests to me that I have to include those people, all people, in this belief.
And there are times I can see that, when I can get there, when I can love their inner child grinning back at me in delight, but I assure you the moments when I can do this are not those moments when I’m staring at an empty parking space where my car used to be, or when a group of eleven men whom one political party has seen fit to place on a Judiciary Committee, plans publicly to question a woman who dares to unearth and share publicly a trauma she experienced at the hands of a person who could well enjoy a lifetime appointment to one of the most influential posts in the nation. It’s hard to get there sometimes friends.
But in the balance we celebrate today, taking on the energy of new members in this community, greeting new members yesterday over food, fellowship, and fun, or even meeting someone face to face who I thought was picking a fight but was really just busy, there is a bright shining gleam of that dignity, and the suggestion of this principle does yet again find a balance on a personal level.
But the history of systematic oppression, where the playing field is not even at all, where the power wielded over the individual is not the mere whim, caprice, or thoughtless word or deed, it is a stacked deck and a fixed game. Where that is the case, we must do more than shake hands or shake it off. Our Seventh Principle, that we are part of an interconnected whole, suggests that actions we take to heal a hurting world can be felt beyond our interpersonal relationships. And so it is fitting that we unveil officially the display of the 7 Unitarian Universalist principles, and the 8thprinciple, adopted here by this congregation, devoted to dismantling oppression and systematic racism in our world. It is a beautiful and a fitting reminder of so much of the work this congregation has done already. And even the way the 8thPrinciple came to be displayed involved a decision by your Board of Directors to find a place of prominence. Your Gallery Team and Aesthetics Team took significant time and consideration both to find just the right spot and to provide some comments about the look and feel of the presentation. Individual members devoted time and resources to its creation. And even friends of the congregation, children, spouses, some of whom are not even members, lent their talents and expertise to this project. And your new 8thPrinciple Task Force saw to its completion.
We now unveil this marvel of cooperation and hope. And as we do let us be reminded not of words on a page, creeds of old, or rules to follow. Rather let us acknowledge the imperfections of language that yet help point us to the perfect balance our wobbling world tells us today is possible, the balance between the compassion for individuals that comes with embracing new souls, and the compassion we carry to our wider world from doing so, the balance of the justice that starts as it always should at home, in this, ourhome, the justice that might ring out in the world from the start we make here together, and most important, the balance of the joy that comes when what was lost is found here for so many, and the joy our work together might stitch into the fabric of this interconnected, wobbling world, strengthening it for those who will come after us.
And may the dreams we know waking, and the dreams we know sleeping, come at last into harmony with all we sense in this world to be right, and just and true. And most of all, may we give life to these dreams together. And may it always be so.
I remember the first real strawberry I ever had. I will never forget it. I was living in Texas and I was in middle school. Out in our back yard, there was a tiny little plot of land that lay between our patio and our pool. My sister decided once to till this tiny plot of land about the size of a large world atlas. And she planted a few things there in the ground. One of the things she planted was a strawberry plant.
She tended all the plants in her atlas-sized plot. It was hard. There is a lot of sun in Texas. It took some work protecting and watering the plants. But she did it. And soon, there on the vine, were things I had never seen before. The first fruits of this plant and the first time I had ever seen anything like this. They were realstrawberries. They started as tiny white bulbs and grew to greenish, more shapely forms. Until they were at last heart-shaped, demure, and radiantly red. The seeds populating the outer skin lay uniform and elegant against the blazing color of the fruit. And the time came when my sister asked if I’d like to try one.
Before I tell you about that experience, please call first into your mind, those grotesque, tasteless, monstrosities also often referred to as strawberries. Recall if you will the last time you tasted one of these things and what it left you wanting. Maybe you have never had a real strawberry straight from the earth. But nowimagine a tiny, delicate shape in your palm. Like a tiny, perfect heart. The seeds are downy soft around the fruit. It is literally warmed by the Texas sun, not cold from a storage facility and trucked in across thousands of miles. And the taste of the fruit, the explosion of what a strawberry is, created in me forever, the conviction that there are actually two different fruits called strawberries on this earth. There are the ones like this, the true, the real, from the infinitesimal molecule of the fruit, to the infinitely greater delight the fruit brings the world over, there are these things that are thoroughly strawberry. And then there are the others. The waxy, the bland, the ponderous and misshapen embodiments and manifestations of something else, something thoroughly un-strawberry—in a phrase: disappointment in the flesh.
And such was the new world of strawberries for me that afternoon following a simple harvest under an unforgiving Texas sun. I bet you all had no idea how strongly I felt about strawberries.
As we heard in the reading, though, strawberries for some are part of the very instant between two worlds, above and below. And we are now suspended in the very time described in our liturgy as the Days of Awe between the New Year first celebrated 5,779 years ago by our Jewish forebears and the Day of Atonement coming this week, Yom Kippur. This is the time when the Book of Life lays open once more for a review of how we’re doing.
Now, the Book of Life is not one of those things featured prominently in the Hebrew Scriptures. There is no account in the scriptures of God presenting to Moses the Book of Life and explaining to Moses about the yearly accounting God would be doing. The most direct reference to some kind of Book of Life comes in one line of one psalm. It reads: “Let them be blotted out of the book of the living; let them not be enrolled among the righteous.”[1]Jewish scholars note that perhaps a more accurate name for the book according to the Hebrew would be the Book of the Living, and not the Book of Life.[2]There are other examples of heavenly ledgers of sorts throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, but this is the only place where the name Book of the Living appears.[3]And there are many examples of heavenly ledgers, though they were really tablets, in ancient Mesopotamia, tens of centuries before our Jewish forebears wrote of them in the psalm. But the Book of the Living isdescribed in detail in the Talmud, comprised of the Mishnah and the Gemara, where much Jewish ceremonial law is written and where ancient rabbinic discussions of the Hebrew Scriptures and laws are recorded.
What is said to happen at this time is really that threebooks are opened. The Talmud says this: “three books are opened in heaven on Rosh Ha-Shanah one for the thoroughly wicked, one for the thoroughly righteous, and one for the intermediate. The thoroughly righteous are forthwith inscribed in the Book of Life, the thoroughly wicked in the Book of Death, while the fate of the intermediate is suspended until the Day of Atonement.”[4]And so it is now, right now, in this time, that the season of the Jewish New Year suggests we consider the approaching Day of Atonement, and set right the ledger of our lives, and move, hopefully, into the pages of the Book of the Living. We are literally, well more like existentially, in suspense.
Now, as someone who has spent some time in Unitarian Universalist circles I have heard all the jokes. There’s the one that I think circulates among my ministerial colleagues at times behind my back that goes like this. “Ah, Unitarian Universalists: a group made up of Universalists, who believe that God is too good to damn any of them. And Unitarians, who believe that theyare too good for any God to damn.” That usually gets a Unitarian Universalist amen. But all joking aside, this little bit of humor, like most humor, comes from truth. And in this case it’s the truth that much of our history is grounded in the idea of universal salvation, which in turn leads to the ideas that this worldis the one we should be most concerned with.
One of the hallmarks of our tradition is encouraging individuals to learn and to explore thisuniverse we populate and to draw from that experience one’s own set of beliefs. Whether through feeling or through study, or through other means, we hope that all arrive at a set of core values and practices that shape a way of experiencing this shared universe as a place of meaning. We heard one example of this learning this morning.
Some of you noticed, I’m sure, the lyrics we sang to our gathering song. It might have been hard for you not to sing the old lyrics. But Jason Shelton, one of the leaders in our movement, who wrote that song, who loves that song, asked anyone who ever sings that song again to sing it with these lyrics. And part of the reason he asks this are the descriptions, by people who can’t walk, people who can’t stand, who explained to him the painful experiences of feeling apart from the community when songs that celebrate or feature abilities they lack are used as centerpieces like this one is.[5]
Now, there are many, many voices, even voices of people who lack the very abilities affected by this change, who did not feel excluded or otherwise impacted by the original lyrics. They actually miss the old lyrics and they like the story of the creation of that song. I mean, the creation of that song is the stuff of Unitarian Universalist legend. In 2004, when a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage was proposed, then President of the UUA, Bill Sinkford, took a call from a reporter in his office about the UUA’s opposition. Jason Shelton was in the office at the time and heard Sinkford say, “We are standing on the side of love.” And the song, according to Jason Shelton, nearly jumped off the page for him and became something of a movement.
But now, in 2018, I don’t think Bill Sinkford would mind my sharing this, but due to his own physical challenges, he sometimes uses a scooter. And the pulpit, of his own church, in Portland, Oregon, was not accessible for him by scooter, was not accessible to anyone in the choir or on the chancel who needed this kind of assistance. So if you were wondering where I was last weekend, it was to answer the call of love I received when that church asked me to take part in a fundraiser to make their chancel fully accessible, and that’s what I did and I got to be present to see one of their lay leaders light that chalice in the church from his scooter for the first time.
Here in the Days of Awe, we are held between two realities. As if there were tigers above, tigers below, we come together in these times, suspended in one of the thin spaces when so many believe the divine draws so near to so many of our lives. For it is in the Days of Awe when we are called to action, not merely to contemplation. These are the days when the Jewish members of our human family counsel that we seek, we ask, we sometimes beg forgiveness, for pardon from those we’ve wronged. We gotta work for it, friends. Action.
And these are the days when we do the internal work it takes, the real, hard, deep work it takes at times to grant forgiveness to those who have shown their sincere repentance, who have sought atonement in their hearts. Action.
And I know. I know. That in at least one, if not dozens, of the hearts we have gathered here today, when the word forgiveness was spoken aloud, a little wall, or maybe only a tiny brick, some separation went up against the idea that we might forgive someone who has wronged us, who has wronged the world. And I want to be clear. That reflex is healthy. That reflex is there to protect you. I will not venture here into those questions considered by minds that contemplate and lives that have seen the very worst of humanity, and suggest that forgiveness is some kind of simple tonic for those complex, compound wrongs. That would cheapen both the act of forgiveness and the trauma that occurred. Even the ancient rituals of atonement in the earliest Jewish communities required in some cases three years, three yearsof the transgressor proving that they had changed their ways and to affirmatively seek forgiveness. There was no cheap grace in the ancient Jewish kingdoms my friends, let me tell you.
And even today, in our time, some forms of forgiveness take so much, are so filled with power, that they pass out of human understanding. The idea that some people forgive others for the things that they have done, at times, surpasses much of our own comprehension.
VIDEO PLAYS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3IdpjUr4JA[6]
I played this video because there is no way to walk out of this sacred moment, after knowing that this story is a true story, and to comprehend the capacity of the human heart to do the work of forgiveness in the same way as you did before learning this story. The very knowledge that someone, somewhere, did this thing in our shared world, changed the world forever, even if only in a small way.
And that is the power for forgiveness. That is the power of the work of atonement. There is a reason this practice has been part of the communities of our shared human family, across the millennia, for as far as history can record. Ask anyone who has done something painful, hurtful, something dreadful to another person. Ask them what the world was like before they felt forgiven. Ask them what the world was like after they felt they were forgiven. The world before is a bland, misshapen, and tasteless void. Compared to the world they found that is sharp, warm, and flourishing, almost like the same name for two completely different things.
Sometimes, it is the unrelenting beating of the blazing heat of our wrongs that gives rise to the real, the best, the brightest fruit of our spirits, of our hearts. It is what drives us to seek a new way, whether that be forgiveness by those we harmed, whether that be a life remade to prevent any more suffering we may have caused, even if we aren’t forgiven by those we harmed yet, whether that be rewriting songs, righting wrongs, or heaven forbid, taking a moment, in the quiet of a new dawning day, to silence the loudest critic many of us will ever know, and to begin the work of forgiving ourselves, to atone for the ways we so often, so mistreat the divine, the awe inspiring, the tender, the loving spirit inside each one of us.
In the beginning, there was nothing. There was a flat shapeless void. Until a tiny white bulb of a promise flowered under a blazing fire in the sky, breaking forth from a tiny patch that might well have been the entire face of the earth, and carried with it the hope, the future, the promise, that a member of our human family, would pluck it from its vine, and offer the fruit of a new creation to another member of our human family, that we might begin again, in love, that we might answer the call of love. And in that one act, change the world for someone, forever.
And may it always be so.
[2]Encyclopedia Judaica, “Book of Life or Book of The Living,” entry by Louis Isaac Rabinowitz (The Gale Group, 2008).
[4]Ibid, citing the Talmud at RH 16b.
[5]For greater detail, you can read “A gesture of love” by Kimberly French, UU World, Fall 2017 also available here: https://www.uuworld.org/articles/gesture-love.
[6]A retelling of a story told to and recounted by Jack Kornfield in After the Ecstasy, the Laundry: How the Heart Grows Wise on the Spiritual Path(New York: Bantam Books, 2000).
Each of us perceives “home” differently. Some say home is where the heart is. Others say it’s anywhere you lay your hat. We will consider together what the nature around us and the nature within us say about what home really means to each one of us.
In America, we promise our children that, if they work hard and play by the rules, they will prosper, and their lives will be better than ours. This Labor Day Sunday, we will hear stories about a recent pilgrimage to ancestral lands and about the exploration of American Dreams—some fulfilled and some denied.
Many attest that we learn by doing. As wonderful as teachings and ideas may be, without action, ideas don’t come to much. We will explore what it means to select a teaching and put it into a practice that might shape our lives.
The thoughts we think and the words we speak create our experiences.
-Louise L. Hay
Can you remember some of the images in the poem, Kindness, that Martina read? Staring out a window forever, eating chicken and maize. An Indian in a white pancho dead on the side of the road. Gazing at bread. Naomi Shihab Nye is an artist at the very height of her powers, surely. And no matter how many times I hear that poem there are parts of it that still surprise me. There are parts of it that still move me, even though those parts have been repeated to me over and over.
It’s one of the most famous poems of the last few decades. And what makes a poem successful, really, just like a song or a story, is that people like to hear it again and again. In fact, it’s a poem that is probably worth repeating and repeating until it’s committed to memory, until the pathways are lain in just right to recall its splendor. It’s probably worth changing our brain to make room for a poem like that. For surely that is one purpose of repetition, to change ourselves somehow. But not everything we do over and over is as pleasurable as reading a masterwork or hearing one read as beautifully as Martina did.
Some of the things we repeat in our lives are painful. Some are even mind numbing. And some make us wonder what on earth we were ever thinking. See, some you may not know this, but I am in a relationship. It’s one I’ve been in for a long time, and yet it’s a relationship I question daily—one that has brought me a lot of good feelings and peace and one that has brought me pain, disappointment, and utter exhaustion at times. See I have a relationship with…running.
Yes, of course, there are times this relationship takes me to wonderful places. On my most recent trip to the mainland, this relationship took me through winding paths lined with towering timbers in Washington State, listening to my nephew, safe on his bike, tell me all about the different kinds of computer codes he’s learning. This relationship took me through the streets of my youth a few weeks ago, staying with a childhood friend, running took me past those fields where I played soccer, that graveyard where I dared friends into harmless danger, and the school where I spent all of my high school years. And this relationship took me through the hills around Portland, Oregon with the groom of an upcoming wedding I’ll be officiating. And I delighted in these changes, these new locations, because between you and me, running and I have been in a little bit of a rut. I know you’re not here to listen to my relationship issues, friends, but hear me out this once.
On Friday morning, I went for a run with a friend. We did the course we’re used to running together. It lacked the terrain of Oregon, the memories of Rochester, the adorableness of Washington, but what it did have was the familiar position of Diamond Head crater on my right and the Pacific Ocean on my left. A trip around the crater with a friend of many years: not too shabby, I know. But speaking of knowing, by this time, my friend and I know this course really, really well now. In fact in the year I’ve been here, I’ve repeated the course so many times that I’ve gotten to know the very contours of the run, those sneaky places that someone driving by would hardly notice are there. But your legs will tell you loud and clear.
See, when you know a place, when you repeat, over and over, the exercise of navigating that space, you learn even the slightest changes in the road. But as our feet pounded out the rhythm Friday morning, something felt different. As a matter of fact, were any of you up and about early Friday morning?
It. Was. Humid.
It was humid enough that at one point I said to my friend that I sincerely felt water resistance, not just wind resistance. And so this route, this course, the concrete and pavement I knew so well hadn’t changed one bit. The path I traveled was the same. But what wasn’t the same, was me. Whatever was happening with the weather, what I’d eaten or not eaten, whether I’d gotten the kind of sleep I needed, the course is the course. It was my body that was responding differently.
Repetition, reading the same text over and over, traveling the same course again and again does something to us. Rereading, rerunning, reveal: they reveal something new, something hidden, something changing. Not in the text—what it says is what it says. Not in the course—where it goes is where it goes. But rather in ourselves.
Poetry and exercise are not the only places where we experience repetition. Sometimes repetition is our aim. This is especially true with particular kinds of texts. In the faith traditions of much of the world, repetition is part of they ways those faiths are practiced. In many of the Judeo Christian forms of worship, prayers, the structure of worship or liturgy, even some of the songs that are sung, all rely on repetition. The text in those worship services and in the lives of the followers, are absorbed or reflected upon in deep and meaningful ways through repetition of those texts.
But a tradition where repetition is even more prominent than in the Judeo Christian traditions is in Buddhism. The lives of many Buddhists rely on a practice of repetition to embody the essential elements of their faith. The Three Jewels of Buddhism are how followers describe the three basic tenets of the faith. The first is the Buddha, the enlightened one or the enlightened nature that is present in the universe. The second is called the Dharma, which is the word for all the teachings delivered by the Buddha, often in the form generations of Buddhist practitioners inherit today as written texts. And the third is the Sangha, which is the community in which the Dharma is taught and practiced alongside others in the faith. These three jewels, the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha, form the bedrock foundation from which the practice of the Buddhist faith grows.
One of the things visitors from the mainland notice when they come to this island is the number of Buddhist temples all throughout the Honolulu area. I am unaware of any city on the mainland with this concentration of Buddhist temples. In this neighborhood alone, in a radius of a mile or two, there are probably half a dozen. I’ve even seen some hidden back in these hills when my relationship with running took me up and down the Pali and through the Nu’uanu streets. There’s even a large Buddhist school right down the road.
So it could make someone unfamiliar with the Buddhist faith and its expression in the world a little confused. They might ask, “Well, if they’re all Buddhist, can’t they all just go to the same temple?” And what this question reveals is a misunderstanding about Buddhism that is commonly and often repeated in the world. What many fail to grasp is that the sects, flavors, languages, interpretations, expressions of the Buddhist faith in the world, are as varied, different, manifold, and vibrant as the many ways that those in the Abrahamic faiths (Jewish, Christian, and Islam) are expressed. A student of this subject could get a degree in Eastern Religious studies with a concentration in Buddhism and still not fully grasp the shades and variations of Buddhism on this island alone.
As varied as these expressions of Buddhism are, one of the things that so, so many forms of Buddhism, including those represented in our neighbors on the Pali Highway, depend upon, rely upon, build their very faiths upon…is repetition. That’s right.
See repetition is at the heart of Buddhist life. The sutras or the sacred texts that contain so much of the Dharma, were not always written texts. They were committed to memory through repetition and passed on orally from generation to generation, repeated and repeated and repeated, until they were finally written down. But before they could be written, in order for the messages and the texts to stay alive, the tool of repetition was used so that those committing the texts to memory would have an easier time of remembering them.
For a vivid example of the importance of repetition to this faith, we can behold one of our neighbors, Soka Gakkai International.
Soka Gakkai practices a type of Japanese Buddhism called Nichiren Buddhism, founded upon the writings of a Buddhist monk in Japan in the Thirteenth Century.[1]
One of the most remarkable parts of practicing with Soka Gakkai is the repetitive chanting of “nom myoho renge kyo.” I’m guessing one or two of us has spent some time with this chant? I have. I had a friend who was really into it. I attended a service where there was a lot of chanting of this phrase. You don’t have to spend long at one of these services to sense that this practice, this repetition, has the power to change you. It’s almost as if the repetition chips away at something in you, or it brings out something in you, and doing the chanting with a room filled with people, all repeating, all chanting together, is powerful. And here’s why that is.
Friends, at too many moments in our lives, we are seen as commodities, as commercial units. We are called consumers by economists, customers by businesses, subscribers by Netflix, users by Facebook, followers by Instagram, but almost never people, never humans, by interests concerned with collecting the money we have. We spend long enough in a day, taking part in our economy, and its easy to feel like the cog in the machine all of these commercial interests want us to be.
And so the idea of repetition, or chanting, something almost like a machine might feel like a lot of things. It might feel pointless. Why say the same thing over and over an over. I heard you the first time. It might feel a little inhuman. Who the heck goes around repeating the same thing over and over to themselves? A person with some issues, right? It might feel uncomfortable. Yeah, it should feel uncomfortable. That’s a good thing.
Because we are people, because we are human beings, we are not actually repeating anything. We can say the same words over and over, and every single time, those words are a little different. We have a little more air or a little less air. Our tongues strike our teeth or the roof of our mouth a little different. The volume we use is slightly greater or lesser. There is no way around it. Stitched into the repeating message, the chanted hope of a gathered people, like our neighbors up the Pali, like millennia of practitioners before us, is a deeper, hidden, powerful message: “you are human.”
The tool is repetition. The task, the work, that this tool is deployed to deliver is…“you are human.”
The more you try to work to repeat something perfectly a second, a third, a fourth, a fiftieth time, a thousandth time, the more and more you will realize, “you are human.”
And you are one of a kind. You are one…of a kind of living beings on this earth. And that kind of being is a human being. You are one of a kind, yes. You are one of our kind. And our kind has some traits. There are things our kind shares. There is something intangible about our kind, you see. You might call it a…kind-ness about us.
And in this moment we are going to learn something handed down to us about our kindness, something about the kind of beings we can be. Send from your mind now those messages about who you are. Send from your mind now those messages about who you are supposed to be. Send from your mind now those messages about who your neighbors are. And send from your mind now those messages about who your neighbors are supposed to be. Rest instead in this moment. Rest the part of your mind that supposes anything, anything at all. And listen to what our ancestors tell us about ourselves, about our kindness.
When the heart has grown in loving kindness
Your dreams become sweet
You fall asleep easily and waken contented
When the heart deepens in loving kindness
Your thoughts become pleasant
And your body heals more easily
When your heart fills with loving kindness
Angles and Devas will love and protect you
And animals will sense your love and not harm you
And people will welcome you everywhere
Your babies will be happy
And if you lose things they will be returned to you
And if you fall off a cliff a tree will always be there to catch you
And the world will become more peaceful around you
And you will bring the blessings of a loving heart to all you touch
The great scholar and teacher Jack Kornfield shares this text in a meditation and he describes it as something collected and repeated throughout centuries in temples throughout the world. In a live version of this meditation, after he reads the line “And if you lose things they will be returned to you,” the audience, breaks into laughter. And without upsetting his meditative rhythm in the slightest, he recognizes the laughter and simply adds, “That’s what it says.” And they are some fantastic promises.
But friends, I tell you true, every week I struggle with the temptations to come before you here, and to repeat whatever insanity has been bubbling from twitter feeds, from trials, or from television, and then to knock them down with our Unitarian Universalist values. I know it feels good to do that. It feels good to hear that. And there are times when we are called to do that, and we will. But I believe repeating those messages, re-tweeting those lies, re-living those experiences, without also remembering to repeat for ourselves those things that remind us who we are, the kind of people we are, that we are one of a much greater source of kindness, can be damaging over time. It will only wear us out, like running a course that never ends.
We always must take time to return again to who we are. Both Unitarians and Universalists were given their names by others after years of defiance. So much of why I love Unitarian Universalism is because of what we defy. But a life of spirit, a life of purpose, cannot only be about what we oppose, what we run from. A life of meaning also cannot only be about passing pines, cresting hills and trotting past our old ways of learning, running and running toward what we think we’ll find somewhere else. Sometimes renewal in our life requires returning again to the home of your soul, and finding and sitting with the kindness that is there.
Maybe we are eating food, maybe chicken and maize, and sensing in that sacred act something of the eternal. Maybe we are passing graveyards or a stranger struck dead along a roadside bathed in white, a soul we’ll never get to know, and sensing our finite selves. And maybe, just maybe, we are only gazing at bread, and knowing, we are not what we eat. We are what we repeat.
And may it ever be so.
[1] For amplification, see https://www.sgi.org/about-us/buddhist-lineage/nichiren.html
Our beloved Spirits and Dennis Graue will share a service of music and reflection about what it is that soothes us, that heals us, that remakes us all together in music.
2500 Pali Highway
Honolulu, HI 96817
Email: office@unitariansofhi.org
Tel: 808.595.4047
Please log into the site.
